Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Grounds For Appeal On The Administrative Law Essay

Grounds For Appeal On The Administrative Law - Essay Example In Estate of Bravada case, a testator executed a will on a piece of notepaper1. Though, there had been two independent witnesses as required under section 9 of the Wills Act, 1837, the testator’s two daughters were also signed as witnesses. However, this is contrary to the section 15 of the Wills Act, 1837. In the above case, the gift was confronted on the footing that under s.15 of the Wills Act 1837, a beneficiary who stood as a witness to a will could not take a gift under that will. In this case, all the three judges declined to fine tune with the customary interpretation of s.15. Salmon LJ viewed that the wording of s.15 of the Wills Act 1837 is too simple, and the section makes it obvious that if any individual signs as a witness to any gift, then such gift shall be declared as null and void2. It is submitted that in Miller case, Jekyll MR had held that a supposed donation of a coach and horses to the donor’s wife failed as there had been no evidence of delivery. The same rationale will be applicable in Bogusz case also as there is no evidence for handing over of the title deeds of the home and the relevant keys to Ms. Cheryle Valley3. The so-called gift by Bogusz to Ms. Cheryle Vallee has established a mere expectation on the part of the donee namely Ms. Cheryle Vallee. However, it is to be noted that proprietary estoppel of 1975 Act will not come to help in Ms. Cheryle Vallee case. Under English law, there will be the transfer of rights under proprietary estoppel if somebody has given a concise promise that they will inherit or acquire a privilege over a property provided if they reasonably bank upon such a promise and if they act in a major way not to their disadvantage on the footing on that promise. If the above-stated ingredients of promises, disadvantage and dependence are present, the usual relief will be that the property will be vested with the claimant, if the court is of  the view that there is a need to permit a claim in the said scenarios.

Monday, February 10, 2020

Case study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 22

Case study - Essay Example r, it is a popular belief amongst experts from the industry that GE should bring change – change in people handling and change in the approach to work at GE. The million dollar question then arises: What is GE doing wrong despite such huge training investments and what area does it need to concentrate on to improve the current working attitude of its people. These questions can only be answered by exploring the approach that GE’s CEO Mr. Jeffrey R. Immelt has adopted to deal with his employees. G.E has a centralized organizational structure. The article mentions that executive recruiter Peter Crist says companies that once poached GE talent now look beyond it to alternatives such as Danaher (DHR), United Technologies (UTX), and even Tyco (TYC), which are viewed as "decentralized, sophisticated, and young." Jeff Immelt practices a democratic style of leadership and the leadership theory that he follows is a traits theory. The quote that best supports the approach says: ‘within GE, the talk is about the new traits leaders will need to thrive, a subject thats reviewed every five years. "We are working on 21st century attributes," explains Chief Learning Officer Susan Peters.’ The above quote shows that human traits are given more importance and Immelt strongly believes that there are some common traits shared by all leaders and that these can be learnt at the Crotonville Management Center. Moreover, the dinner weekends that Immelt organizes and the focus that he has started to give to his employees also support that he practices a democratic form of leadership. Immelt seems to be making both programmed and non programmed decisions as on one side he is only following the old and timed practices of GE’s human resource management, but on the other side he is experimenting with his new ideas of bonding with his employees. Instead of bringing out a change in how employees are trained he believes that what GE has been doing is in the best interest of its